Make Train Travel Safe? OK … How?

When people talk about why they prefer traveling by train—short haul or long distance, it doesn’t matter—they always seem to conclude by saying, “. . . and there’s none of those security lines you have to go through at the airport!”
 
That could be about to change.
 
There’s some serious talk in Congress about needing more and better security for passenger rail. I’m certainly in favor of keeping rail travel safe—who isn’t?—but where do you start and, more to the point, where do you stop?
 
Should we screen all passengers when boarding? And if so, why? Trying to prevent someone from commandeering a passenger jet traveling 500-plus miles an hour is one thing. But a train? On the ground? On a track?
 
Security in a major railway station like Chicago Union station is one thing. But are we going to have the TSA in Hutchinson, Kansas, at 2:30 in the morning to screen passengers boarding the Southwest Chief? All three of them?
 
sunset-wreck
 In 1995, someone deliberately derailed the Sunset Limited. One dead, 100 injured. It happened 50 miles from Phoenix in the middle of the Arizona desert. That was 21 years ago and they’ve never found the people who did it. What security measures could have prevented that?
 
The TSA is now costing taxpayers almost $8 billion a year. How much more will it cost if passenger rail is included and what would the TSA guard against. And how? And where?
 
I’m certainly not opposed to more and better security for train travel. I’m just not sure there’s a practical, effective way to do it.

3 Comments

  1. No! NEVER! No TSA thugs on trains. I love aviation, I have a pilot’s license but refuse to fly domestically for among many reasons, the unconstitutional TSA searches. If I can’t drive or take my beloved Amtrak, I don’t go. NO TSA on Amtrak!

  2. I think at minimum, the TSA should be heavy at all the major stations like Penn Station. I was living in Manhattan during 9/11 and was always concerned that Penn Station is directly underneath Madison Square Garden. The possibilities for trouble are definitely there.

    1. A would-be terrorist will soon find the flaws in the system, I’m afraid. During the lockdown in Brussels, all big stations where partially closed, and all passengers getting into the station had to be screened. It took forever, stations where empty, because everyone was waiting outside, and if you had wanted, you could easily have taken a local/suburban train one station earlier with your ‘gear’ and do your think once you arrive a couple of minutes later. This is not about security, it’s to show you’re doing something, whatever it is, to make people feel safer, not make them safer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.