Honolulu’s Transit Opponents Have No Shame
Honolulu has had three shots at a transit system over four decades. The first two times, the project lost on 5-4 votes by the Honolulu City Council. The third time proved to be the charm when transit was approved by Honolulu voters last November.
Is transit needed on Oahu? You tell me. This shot was taken a month or so ago after a three-car accident occurred on a local freeway during afternoon rush hour.
But, as expected, the rail opponents still rant and rave.
And lie.
Yesterday, an organization called Small Business Hawaii trotted out a study that actually claims the city’s transit system will be more polluting than automobiles … a statement so easily and so often disproved as to be patently absurd. (As testimony to the depth of work going into this document, Small Business Hawaii paid the princely sum of five thousand dollars for it.)
Standing behind the clown who wrote this disgraceful screed was Hawaii State Senator Sam Slom, a Republican, who has also headed Small Business Hawaii for several decades. Slom, an arrogant, inflexible libertarian ideologue, is heartily detested by most people holding differing views who have ever had to deal with him.
Years ago, when Honolulu was debating transit for the second time, I briefly served on the board of directors of Small Business Hawaii. Opening the paper one morning, I read to my great surprise that SBH had come out in opposition to the city’s transit project.
I immediately called Sam and asked how a policy decision like that could be made without board approval. “It’s my prerogative,” Sam said. “Well,” I replied, “if that’s the way decisions are made, I may have to reconsider my participation as a board member.” “I’ll have a membership refund check in the mail to you this afternoon,” Sam snapped. And he hung up.
That’s who is behind this absurd, embarrassing, insulting, biased, half-baked, fraudulent “study.”
But what’s truly shocking is that the Honolulu media actually bought it … at least to the extent that they gave it equal play on the TV news last night. No skepticism, no questions, no checking the credentials of the guy who prepared it.
Somewhere, Walter Cronkite is spinning in his grave like a goddam top!
They came up with the name Alliance for Traffic Improvement
Bowflex
I lived in Honolulu from 1982 to 1989. During that time the amount of time spent in gridlocked traffic seemed to double. Thinking ahead a decade or two or three, the island would be approaching the edges of my definition of “livability”, so we left.
I’ve also watched the long and winding road rail has taken over the past 20 years. Point in fact, Cliff Slater and his group consisting mainly of tour bus companies, taxis and trolley operators, opposed the 1992 rail project and suggested the city do buses instead. The called themselves the Committee On Sensible Transit (COST). Fast forward to 2001 and when the city proposes a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)system, Slater, Dale Evans, Panos and this same cast of characters are opposed to it, too. They came up with the name Alliance for Traffic Improvement. Now in 2009, this group, calling themselves Stop Rail Now, want HOT lanes, express buses and toll roads instead of rail. Truth is they want no form of public subsidized transportation at all.
I agree! Hawaii needs rail and its ridiculous that a small number of individuals are stirring up all this trouble in a last ditch effort to stop the project! We need to voice our support for rail and not let this anti-rail minority ruin it for all of us!!
Preach on! I am so very frustrated that Honolulu’s rail, which has been blessed by the friggin’ Sierra Club fergawdsakes, would get bashed like this and none of the media push back on this “study” and its sponsors.